JOEL TIAGO RESEARCH

AI research papers and evidence reviews

Working papers and broadcast companions by Joel Tiago in Windhoek, Namibia, with linked sources, transcripts and presentation material.

The papers below are openly readable working drafts. They have not been submitted, accepted or peer reviewed. A companion explains the topic for a broad audience; its evidence record shows how selected claims were assessed. A working paper develops the question and method in more detail.

EDUCATION · WORKING PAPER V0.1 · 16 SEPTEMBER 2026

AI tutoring and teacher support in Namibia

An evidence review of the education episode and its ten-slide presentation. It examines learner and teacher statistics, tutoring, language access, product availability and independent learning. Ten transcript groups and four additional slide claims are assessed. No classroom trial or measured learning gain is claimed.

Read the paper · Download the six-page PDF · Inspect the 14 assessments · Read the education companion

AI CONCEPTS · WORKING PAPER V0.2 · 16 SEPTEMBER 2026

Reviewing a public explanation of AI in Namibia

A methodological working paper based on The AI Focus introduction. The companion distinguishes AI, machine learning, deep learning, generative AI and general intelligence, with twelve selected assessments, author clarifications and supporting slide material.

Read the working paper · Download the manuscript · Inspect the 12 assessments · Read the introduction companion

How to cite and interpret these papers

Include Joel Tiago as author, the paper’s displayed title, its year and version, its working-paper status, and its permanent page URL. Cite a specific evidence-record link when discussing an individual assessment. A paper’s date describes that version; a video’s upload date does not establish the original broadcast date.

Before relying on a finding, read its scope and correction history. The source transcript is preserved separately from editorial clarifications. Supporting slides contribute teaching content and claims, but are not treated as proof of an outcome.

Browse the full episode archive · About the author and disclosures